In addition to the terms set forth elsewhere in the contract, the contractor may earn an extension or reduction to the contract period from a minimum of 1 to a maximum of 5 years on the basis of performance during the evaluation periods. The contractor is evaluated during the first year of performance, but extensions or reductions start in the second year. If scores are very good during Year 2, the contractor earns Year 4; if scores are very good in Year 3, the contractor earns Year 5. In Year 5, the contractor must earn a score of "excellent" in order for the contract period to be extended beyond Year 5. Consistent scores of "excellent" during succeeding years earn contract period extensions up to a maximum of 10 years. The contract period may also be reduced on the basis of the contractor’s performance against the stated performance parameters. Points are awarded or deducted during each year of the contract on the basis of how the contractor has performed against the predetermined criteria. The contract period is then extended or reduced to reflect this assessment.
(a) Award Term. The award-term concept is an incentive that permits extension of the contract period beyond the base period of performance for superior performance or reduction of the contract period of performance because of poor performance.
(b) Term Points. Positive or negative points are accumulated during each evaluation period on the basis of the contractor's performance. An accumulation of positive points (e.g., +50, +75, or +100) is required for a one-year term extension, and an accumulation of negative points (e.g., -50, -75, or -100) results in a one-year reduction in the contract period.
(c) Monitoring of Performance. The contractor's performance will be continually monitored by the performance monitors whose findings are reported to the ATRB. The ATRB recommends an award term to the TDO, who makes the final decision on the award-term amount on the basis of the contractor's performance during the award-term evaluation period.
(d) Award-Term Plan. The evaluation criteria, the associated points, and the associated award-term extensions or reductions are specified in the award-term plan.
(e) Modification of Award-Term Plan. Changes may be made to the award-term plan at any time during contract performance, provided that both parties agree to them. If agreement cannot be reached on changes, the initial award-term plan remains in effect.
(f) Self-Evaluation. The contractor will submit to the CO, within 5 working days after the end of each award-term evaluation period, a brief written self-evaluation of its performance for that period. This self-evaluation shall be limited to 25 pages. It will be used in the ATRB's evaluation of the contractor's performance during this period.
(g) Disputes. Decisions regarding the award term, including—but not limited to— the amount of the award term, if any; the methodology used to calculate the award term; calculation of the award term; the supplier's entitlement to the award term; and the nature and success of the contractor's performance, are made by the TDO. These decisions are final and are not subject to dispute.
(h) Award-Term Extension. The contract period may be modified to reflect the TDO decision. The total contract ordering period, including extensions under this clause, will not exceed 5 years, or the time remaining on the SeaPort™ contracts, including exercised options. The award-term provision must be included in the solicitation and resulting TO. If at any time the contract period does not extend more than two years from the TDO decision, the operation of the award-term provision will cease and the ordering period will not extend beyond the term set at that time.
Award-fee contract arrangements: Using evaluation factors established in an award fee plan, award-fee contracts are a tool for subjectively assessing contractor performance for a given evaluation period. They allow contractors to earn a portion (if not all) of an award-fee pool established at the beginning of the evaluation period. The agency unilaterally determines the amount of earned fee. In the context of PBSA, the award-fee evaluation will be based on a subjective assessment of how well the contractor meets or exceeds the applicable performance standards.
Award-term contract arrangements: Award-term arrangements are very similar to award-fee contracts, however, instead of money as compensation for quality performance, the contractor is awarded additional periods of performance. Or, if performance is habitually below standard, the period of performance can be shortened. Award-term arrangements are most suitable when establishing of a long-term relationship is valuable both to the government and to the potential contractor. They differ from options in that award terms are based on a formal evaluation process and do not entail the regulatory procedures associated with priced options. Award-term arrangements are relatively new.